The false Vatican, under the leadership of Antipope Prevost, has issued yet another document. It is entitled “Pathways for the Implementation Phase of the Synod” and was published on July 7, 2025.
At the start of the document, the different phases of the implementation of “synod” are described. They are as follows: implementation of “synodality” in the dioceses from now until December 2026, then phases of evaluation, and finally, in October 2028, Ecclesial Assembly in the Vatican.
Here are some snippets from the document, along with my commentary:
“The synodal form of the Church is at the service of its mission, and any change in the life of the Church is intended to make it more capable of proclaiming the Kingdom of God and witnessing to [sic] the Gospel of the Lord to the men and women of our time.”
Jesus told His disciples: “Going therefore, teach ye all nations” (Mt 28:19). The false “synodal church” has no intention of doing that. They have no intention of affirming that the Holy Catholic Church is the only true religion and that its mission is to try to convert all human beings. Instead, both this document and the document from October 2024 talk of “conversion” and apply it to the Church. The current document quotes the earlier one: “the call to mission is, at the same time, the call to the conversion of each local Church and of the whole Church”.
“Every local Church, every parish community will be able to practise synodality within its ordinary pastoral ministry […]. The FD [Final Document] invites local Churches to also identify «formation pathways to bring about a tangible synodal conversion in the various ecclesial contexts» (FD, no. 9). The implementation phase therefore aims to have a tangible impact on the life of the Church and on the functioning of its structures and institutions.”
In other words, the aim of “synodality” is to change the functioning of every parish on the planet. They want to change the hierarchical structure of the Catholic Church, but what they are really accomplishing is setting up a false church.
“If it were to be limited to the formulation of abstract hypotheses, it would not achieve its purpose and, above all, it would dissipate the enthusiasm and energy that the synodal process has generated so far.”
This is a joke, right? In addition to “enthusiasm”, the document uses the word “dynamism” five times (once as “synodal dynamism”), giving the impression that “synodality” is demanded by the people. Since 2020, the number of churchgoers has gone down drastically, and basically no one is interested in synodality, so this statement is an obvious falsehood.
“The implementation phase was opened by Pope Francis with the Accompanying Note of 24 November 2024, in which he entrusted the FD to the entire Church. In an unprecedented act in the history of the synodal institution, he declares that the FD «participates in the ordinary Magisterium of the Successor of Peter (cf. EC 18 § 1; CCC 892)» and asks that it be accepted as such. It is therefore the FD, in its totality, that is the point of reference for the implementation phase.”
As I discussed in my article on the Synod final document, the fact that Bergoglio declared it to be part of the Magisterium, shows that Bergoglio could not have been the Pope, because that document contains heresy denying the primacy of the pope. I wrote about it in more detail in my previous article. No Catholic can be forced to accept that heretic document.
“[…] it is important that this new process contribute concretely «to expand possibilities for participation and for the exercise of differentiated co-responsibility by all the Baptised, men and women» […]”
Our Lord Jesus Christ has established the Catholic Church and he ordered that certain men, the priests and the bishops lead it. Not just any men or women, but men who were ordained. Anyone who attempts to change this principle goes directly against the foundation laid by Our Lord.
I also want to call attention to another passage later on in the document:
“In addition to the leading lines mentioned above, the dynamism that animates the FD, and which the implementation phase is called to take on, derives from the continuous articulation of certain polarities and tensions that structure the life of the Church and the way in which ecclesiological categories express it. Here are some of these polarities: the whole Church and the local Church; the Church as the People of God, as the Body of Christ and as the Temple of the Spirit; the participation of all and the authority of some; synodality, collegiality and primacy; the common priesthood and the ministerial priesthood; ministry (ordained and instituted ministries) and participation in the mission by virtue of baptismal vocation without a ministerial form. Implementation of the FD requires addressing and discerning these tensions as they arise in the circumstances in which each local Church exists.”
Tension between the Body of Christ and the Temple of the Spirit? Tension between the Son and the Holy Spirit?
This paragraph sounds like Hegel’s Dialectics, a theory invented by the German philosopher Georg Hegel. It is often summarized as “thesis – antithesis – synthesis”. He claimed that the world is in a constant struggle. When one idea (thesis) appears, its opposite (antithesis) shortly follows. After some struggle, the ideas merge into a new idea (synthesis) and that synthesis becomes the new thesis and the cycle repeats. In this case, there is the “struggle” between the hierarchical structure and “synodality” which has to resolve itself in some way.
It would seem that the construction of the false “church” everywhere in the world is at hand.
For those who are interested in more commentary, I will link the video from the Catholic Esquire on this topic. Just like with the Synod closing document from last October, he has provided some fitting analysis and commentary here.